State Representative Demands Alamogordo Town News Retract Stories; Publication Declines and Asserts Full Press Protections

Image

State Representative Demands Alamogordo Town News Retract Stories; Publication Declines and Asserts Full Press Protections - AlamogordoTownNews.org

ALAMOGORDO, N.M. — Alamogordo Town News, a community civic publication operated by the Southwestern Trails Cultural Heritage Association, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization, has received a formal legal demand from an attorney representing State Representative John P. Block IV (R-District 51) seeking the removal of published articles, the issuance of a written retraction, and the identification of confidential sources. The publication has formally refused every demand.

A formal written response was transmitted via certified mail on April 9, 2026, and by electronic mail on April 10, 2026, to the attorney of record. A simultaneous copy was forwarded to staff counsel at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, a national organization that provides legal resources to journalists and news organizations facing legal pressure from public officials.

What Was Published — and Why

Alamogordo Town News has published a series of stories examining Representative Block's official legislative record, including his voting history on major appropriations legislation, his bill passage rate across four sessions of the New Mexico Legislature, and the consistency between his public statements about district funding and the documented official record. All reporting was sourced from publicly accessible legislative records, official roll call votes, court filings, and the representative's own published statements.

The Association additionally published reporting derived from an active civil court matter filed in the 12th Judicial District Court in Otero County — a public court proceeding, the records of which are accessible to any member of the public.

The Legal Demand — and ATN's Response

Representative Block's attorney transmitted a cease-and-desist letter on April 2, 2026, the same date the representative issued a press release on campaign letterhead characterizing the publication's stories as "false, misleading, and defamatory." The legal demand listed multiple claims, including defamation, false light, business disparagement, tortious interference, and a demand for identification of confidential sources.

The Southwestern Trails Cultural Heritage Association's formal response, dated April 8, 2026, declined every demand. It further noted that the representative's press release contained a specific factual claim about the status of the active court matter that is directly contradicted by the official court docket retrieved from the New Mexico Courts case management system as of April 8, 2026. The court record shows the case remains open and in active proceedings.

The Law — What Courts Have Held

Reporting on the official conduct of a sitting elected official is among the most strongly protected forms of expression under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The United States Supreme Court established in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) that a public official cannot recover damages for reporting about his official conduct unless he proves the publication was made with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for the truth — a demanding standard that courts have consistently applied to protect civic and community journalism.

New Mexico courts have applied that standard consistently. In a case that arose in Alamogordo itself — Furgason v. Clausen, decided by the New Mexico Court of Appeals in 1989 — the court affirmed that the Alamogordo Daily News was protected when it reported information derived from official government records, even where those records later proved to contain an error. The court held that accurate reporting from official documents carries an absolute privilege. New Mexico's Supreme Court declined to review the decision, leaving it as controlling law in the state.

New Mexico also provides statutory protection for journalists through its reporter shield law and its Anti-SLAPP statute, which allows courts to dismiss lawsuits filed to chill protected speech and to award attorney's fees to the prevailing news organization.

A Pattern Documented Across New Mexico and the Nation

New Mexico has a documented history of defamation claims by public officials failing in its courts. Former New Mexico Senate Majority Leader Michael Sanchez — himself a licensed attorney — publicly stated he concluded he could not pursue a defamation claim over a political advertisement he believed was false, explaining: "The burden of proof is different than it is for a regular person." A sitting state commissioner who pursued a claim over a political advertisement was denied relief by a judge who stated from the bench: "I'd rather have that than lose the First Amendment."

Nationally, courts have consistently dismissed defamation suits by elected officials against community news organizations. In one recent example widely covered by press freedom organizations, a small nonprofit news outlet in Wisconsin was sued by a politician over its reporting. After two years of costly litigation — which the paper survived only through fundraising support and pro bono legal assistance — the courts dismissed the case entirely, including on appeal. The news organization's reporting was found to have been conducted responsibly, and no actual malice was found.

Publication Statement

Alamogordo Town News will continue its civic journalism mission, including accountability reporting on the official conduct, legislative voting record, and public statements of elected officials serving Otero County and New Mexico's 51st House District. Our reporting is grounded in public records and sourced information. We will not be silenced by legal threats, and we will not retract accurate reporting.

Any future litigation filed in this matter will be met with a full defense, including pursuit of all available remedies under New Mexico's Anti-SLAPP statute.

— OFFICIAL PUBLIC STATEMENT —

Statement of Southwestern Trails Cultural Heritage Association Regarding Legal Demand by State Representative John P. Block IV

April 9, 2026

Southwestern Trails Cultural Heritage Association | Alamogordo, New Mexico

The Southwestern Trails Cultural Heritage Association, which operates Alamogordo Town News, 2nd Life Media, and AlamogordoTownNews.org, issues the following statement in response to the legal demand transmitted on behalf of State Representative John P. Block IV and the representative's public press release of April 2, 2026.

Our Position Is Unequivocal

We have declined every demand in the cease-and-desist letter. No article will be removed. No retraction will be issued. No source will be identified. Our publication will continue.

We did not arrive at this position casually. We arrived at it because our reporting is accurate, because it is grounded in official public records and verified documentation, and because the law of the State of New Mexico and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protect exactly this kind of community accountability journalism — and have done so consistently for decades.

Our Reporting Is Public Record Journalism

Every article at issue in Representative Block's demand is sourced from public documents: official legislative roll call votes published by the New Mexico Legislature, the New Mexico Secretary of State's Signed and Chaptered Bills database, active court records accessible to any member of the public at the 12th Judicial District Court in Otero County, and the representative's own published press releases, website, and biographical statements.

The residents of Otero County and New Mexico's 51st House District have a right to accurate information about their elected representative's official conduct. That is not a political position. It is a constitutional one, affirmed repeatedly by the courts of this state and nation.

The Law Protects This Journalism

Representative Block is a public official. Under New Mexico law and the First Amendment, a public official who claims defamation must prove that a publication was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for whether it was true or false. That is a demanding legal standard — deliberately so. Courts have recognized that democratic self-government requires that the press be free to report on, criticize, and scrutinize the official conduct of elected officials without fear of legal retaliation.

The controlling precedent in New Mexico was established, in part, in an Alamogordo courthouse. In Furgason v. Clausen (1989), the New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed that the Alamogordo Daily News was protected when it published information drawn from official government records — even where the underlying official record contained an error — because accurate reporting from official documents carries an absolute privilege under New Mexico law. Our reporting on Representative Block's official legislative record is sourced entirely from official government documents of that same kind.

New Mexico's experience is consistent with what courts have held across the country: public officials do not prevail in defamation suits over accurate reporting on their official conduct. Former New Mexico Senate Majority Leader Michael Sanchez, a licensed attorney, reviewed the applicable legal standard and concluded he could not pursue a defamation claim even over reporting he believed was false. A sitting New Mexico commissioner who did pursue such a claim was denied relief by a judge who stated plainly that protecting the First Amendment mattered more.

On the Representative's Press Release

Representative Block's April 2, 2026 press release — issued the same day his attorney's letter arrived — states as established fact that the civil matter referenced in our reporting "has since been resolved amicably between the parties." The official court docket retrieved from New Mexico's case management system on April 8, 2026 shows that the case is open, in active proceedings, and that no settlement, dismissal, or resolution of any kind has been entered by the court.

Our reporting described an active public court matter. The public court record confirms that characterization was accurate. The representative's press release, by contrast, contains a specific factual claim that the official court record directly contradicts.

What Happens Next

We have notified the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press — a Washington-based organization that supports journalists facing legal pressure from public officials — of this situation. They have reviewed matters of this kind with us previously.

If Representative Block files a lawsuit, we will defend it. We will do so with the full weight of the First Amendment, New Mexico's reporter shield law, the absolute privilege for reporting on official judicial and legislative proceedings, and New Mexico's Anti-SLAPP statute — which provides for dismissal of retaliatory lawsuits, along with an award of attorney's fees and costs against the party who filed them.

We are a small nonprofit organization. We do not have the resources of a major metropolitan newspaper. What we have is an accurate, documented record, the protection of the law, and a commitment to the people of Otero County who deserve honest information about the officials who represent them.

We invite Representative Block, if he believes any specific factual statement in our reporting is provably false, to identify that statement in writing with supporting evidence. We will review it carefully and in good faith. That is the appropriate foundation for a dispute of this kind.

What we will not do — under any circumstance — is retract accurate reporting about the official conduct of an elected public official in response to a legal threat.

More News from Alamogordo
I'm interested
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive