Image
ALAMOGORDO — The future of public access to Bonito Lake takes center stage Tuesday, September 1, at 6 p.m. as Voices of Alamogordo hosts a community forum at Otero Arts, 1118 Indiana Ave. at 12th Street, to discuss a fencing proposal that would close the lake to the public.

The forum comes amid renewed controversy over the lake, which residents waited more than a decade to see reopened. Bonito Lake was closed after the 2012 Little Bear Fire, when the burn scar left no vegetation and subsequent heavy rains washed silt and gravel down the canyon into the lake . In September 2017, Alamogordo city commissioners approved an $8.6 million contract to drain, dredge, and restore the lake , and with sediment catchment basins completed to protect against future erosion, the lake was refilled in 2023 .
Even the reopening proved star-crossed. The lake was scheduled to reopen in May 2024 — with trout stocked the day before — when the Blue 2 Fire forced the area closed once again . Bonito Lake finally reopened for fishing only on August 30, 2024 .
Barely two years later, the lake’s future is again in question. City Manager Stockwell has proposed building a fence around the reservoir, citing unsafe conditions, worsening infrastructure, and a lack of funds to maintain the area . Stockwell has argued the city’s primary focus should be preserving the lake as a dependable water supply, and that restricting access would help ensure it remains a reliable source .
The proposal has already drawn pushback. When Stockwell presented the closure at a recent commission meeting, some commissioners questioned whether fencing off the lake is the best way to address the problem, with one suggesting that if the campground is unusable, the city should close the campground rather than the lake, noting the area is a tourist attraction. The City Commission tabled a vote on the proposal until its September 22 meeting — making Tuesday’s forum a timely opportunity for public input before commissioners take up the matter.
City Manager Robert Stockwell will join the panel to explain his proposal and the reasoning behind it. Offering historical perspective will be former Mayor Susan Payne, who will discuss the lake’s history and the efforts made to reopen it to the public during her time in office.
Dr. Stephanie Hernandez, who previously served as acting city manager, will address the direction she gave during her tenure to seek funding for the lake, including a lodger’s tax proposal intended to support its operation.
The economic stakes of the debate will be represented by the owner of Bonito Bait and Tackle, who will speak to the significance of the lake and the livelihoods tied to its continued existence. Rounding out the panel are Commissioner Warren Robinson, who will discuss his role in the debate as an elected official
The forum begins at 6 p.m. and is hosted by Alamogordo Town News. It will be broadcast live on KALH Radio and streamed on YouTube for those unable to attend in person. Organizers are billing the event as a civil conversation and encourage community members to attend.

First of all this “environmental activism” is mostly a group of failed bureaucrats doing interpretive dance in the town square, hoping someone will clap, because Bonito never drew crowds so much as it collected stray shopping carts and the occasional confused goose—so pouring money into keeping it open for a few thousand people is like hiring a full orchestra to play “Happy Birthday” in an empty basement, especially when the prize on the other side of the ledger is control of the water supply; and the Good-Doing “Doctor,” bless her laminated credentials, once again proves that a bargain-bin education plus a fancy title mainly means she still needs a paycheck (honey, the seat is not opening, the intermission ended years ago, collect your coat and go).
More comments from people afraid to use their real names. Makes their comments worth zero. Sorry, bumble bee tuna. Show yourself out.
and their comments need to be preserved to illuminate the fact that many people are simply fools. years ago, i read that the Mescalero Apache's were the highest per capita income native-american nation in our country. they had the good fortune to be banished to a place that had no oil/gold/diamonds/copper/or any other lucrative natural resources - any of which, would have resulted in treaties being ignored, and the tribe being shuffled off to another "worthless" plot of land. but they were situated in a place with great natural beauty, and to their credit they have wisely used that resource to their people's advantage. what's really being discussed here, is whether the white-eyes are smart enough to do the same.
Who seem ilinformed, when is the last time you got off your couch and went into the real world of Mother Nature-we as human beings are the stewards of the Earth. I have been camping and hiking in the area...it is a treasure. Your comment got my attention because you are absoluately cold hearted and I will pray for well-being