Image

A newly released study; Doucette, M.L., Hemraj, D., Macfarlan, D.L. et al. The Cost Effectiveness of Adjunctive Medical Cannabis Therapy in the Treatment of Moderate Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Clin Drug Investig (2025) suggests that Medical cannabis products, particularly non-flower formulations, represent a cost-effective adjunctive therapy for moderate PTSD under various reimbursement scenarios. This analysis underscores the importance of evidence-based reimbursement policies to improve patient access to cost-effective treatments while ensuring financial sustainability for payors.
The new study says of non-flower products, findings suggest policymakers may want to “prioritize reimbursement policies that that support these cost-effective options while recognizing the limited cost effectiveness of dried flower under certain conditions.”
“This study finds the dried flower is likely less cost effective compared to other medical cannabis products,” it says. “While medical patients may have preferences towards using dried flower, from a payor perspective, it may not make sense to reimburse for all types of medical cannabis products. Evidence here, combined with existing body of literature examining the impact of smoke inhalation on lungs, suggests payors may reduce some of the negative harms and promote some of the positive benefits from medical cannabis through strategic reimbursement strategies that are cost effective, largely safe, and likely efficacious.”
This compliments a finding from last month in a study that concluded that state-level medical marijuana legalization appeared to significantly reduce health insurance costs. In states with legal medical cannabis, companies paid 3.4 percent less for health insurance premiums compared to where marijuana remained illegal—a savings of about $238 per employee per year.
Per the various findings if all states were to implement medical cannabis programs, that study said, the country could save an estimated $29 billion in health insurance costs annually.
a perfect example of the incompetence of the trump regime - bathwater out - baby out...details - we don't need no stinkin details. the only paint brush they possess must be half a mile wide...government by fools and charlatans.
This was not a notice of action, but a request for compliance.
Sunny, with a high of 93 and low of 63 degrees. Sunny in the morning, clear overnight.
Dolly has started a great program and I commend her efforts.
I know it's been a while since I've bought a children's book, but I don't think $33 per book would be considered a bargain even at today's prices.
The proposed rules would likely force all outdoor construction to happen only between the hours of dusk - dawn from April - October.
I wonder how many of the idiots proposing and supporting this rule need a new roof on their house, or on their neighbors house.
it's interesting to read that the proposed "wording is dangerous to small business owners"....please consider the potential for danger to the folks who are working in the heat. one danger is an inconvenience/expense - the other is potential death.
I would take it that you have not read the actual proposed rule. The link is in the article.
I believe that even as a former construction worker who would seem to want better rules in place, you'll end up agreeing that the proposed rules go to far.
Teaching in a low-performing school serving economically disadvantaged populations.
That pretty much covers every teacher in the state.
This executive order does nothing that the governor couldn't have done on her own without an EO.
While the Office of the Governor's website calls this a drought emergency, no where in the actual EO is it called an emergency, nor or emergency powers invoked.
So after months of investigation, only 3 items were substantiated.
First, a failure to use the increased funding on capital improvements (fixing the ac). This is a matter that should receive priority, as physical activity should play a major role in any youth center.
If they would've labeled it as beef, carrots, potatoes, and other natural ingredients, there would be no need for a recall.
not to worry - under the trump regime there won't be nearly as many safeguards for situations like this. we'll be able to determine your personal level of safety purely on your ability to pay for that protection.
You love to rant against president Trump, but like most people who rant against him, your rants have no substance, and no merit.
I would expect that sometime in the near future the CDC will also drop recommendation of the vaccine for healthy adults.
out of curiosity, are you a "so called pediatrician"?
What I am is someone who is capable of understanding scientific methodology, political motivation, and financial incentive.
The decision to vaccinate children was not based on science, in fact the best science available at the time recommended more study. It was based solely on politics and money.
Hmmm, maybe I should run for mayor.
I can see the headlines now;
"Mayor Payne Succeeded by Mayor Pain In The Butt."