Image
A newly released study; Doucette, M.L., Hemraj, D., Macfarlan, D.L. et al. The Cost Effectiveness of Adjunctive Medical Cannabis Therapy in the Treatment of Moderate Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Clin Drug Investig (2025) suggests that Medical cannabis products, particularly non-flower formulations, represent a cost-effective adjunctive therapy for moderate PTSD under various reimbursement scenarios. This analysis underscores the importance of evidence-based reimbursement policies to improve patient access to cost-effective treatments while ensuring financial sustainability for payors.
The new study says of non-flower products, findings suggest policymakers may want to “prioritize reimbursement policies that that support these cost-effective options while recognizing the limited cost effectiveness of dried flower under certain conditions.”
“This study finds the dried flower is likely less cost effective compared to other medical cannabis products,” it says. “While medical patients may have preferences towards using dried flower, from a payor perspective, it may not make sense to reimburse for all types of medical cannabis products. Evidence here, combined with existing body of literature examining the impact of smoke inhalation on lungs, suggests payors may reduce some of the negative harms and promote some of the positive benefits from medical cannabis through strategic reimbursement strategies that are cost effective, largely safe, and likely efficacious.”
This compliments a finding from last month in a study that concluded that state-level medical marijuana legalization appeared to significantly reduce health insurance costs. In states with legal medical cannabis, companies paid 3.4 percent less for health insurance premiums compared to where marijuana remained illegal—a savings of about $238 per employee per year.
Per the various findings if all states were to implement medical cannabis programs, that study said, the country could save an estimated $29 billion in health insurance costs annually.
PNM should give money back to all those they severely overcharged instead of making customers find a way to make payments for PNM's mistakes.
Sunny, with a high of 94 and low of 78 degrees. Sunny for the morning, clear in the afternoon and evening,
To improve Alamogordo, let's revert to the founding principles - only landowners should vote. Carpetbaggers like this ******* should go back to the plantation in Mississippi.
Wow! You can tell this dude’s mouth was open while he was being born. Just think about it for a moment…
Naw. He's right. We're the ones with skin in the game. Boonies ain't right with the world. They've proven it.
One correction is needed in the “New America” story: Ron deSantis is the governor of Florida, Greg Abbott is the Texas governor.
Regarding Let’s Grow Alamo. Shouldn't a professional consultant with expertise in this area tell us what will work? Trolling for the public to be "brutally honest" will produce a report filled with excuses, not good ideas, because if anyone here had one, they'd be doing it already, and they aren't.
Seems like the city continues to have projects that go into cost overruns pretty consistently. Maybe watch out for the cost overruns on the Natatorium and see who profits…
If the City hired a qualified construction company, THEY should have bid on the appropriate materials for the job. In this change order, it seems they either didn’t know that the mammoth fire trucks would require a thick concrete pad, or they lowballed their bid, only to come back with this change order.