Image
On July 26, 2025, the New Mexico State Police Investigations Bureau was requested to investigate an officer-involved shooting involving New Mexico State Police (NMSP).
Investigators learned that at approximately 1:00 p.m., the Santa Fe Police Department (SFPD) was dispatched to 18A Reata Road for a welfare check. The calling party requested a welfare check on her daughter, who she believed was being physically assaulted by her boyfriend, Paul Gallegos (38).
Upon arrival, SFPD officers made contact with the daughter, who exited a recreational vehicle (RV) on the property through a window. Despite visible injuries including facial swelling and scratches, she denied any domestic abuse had occurred.
While officers were speaking with her, they heard a gunshot coming from inside the RV. SFPD officers then requested assistance from the New Mexico State Police.
At approximately 1:25 p.m., NMSP officers arrived on scene and established a perimeter around the RV. As verbal commands were being issued for Gallegos to exit, an NMSP officer observed what appeared to be the barrel of a firearm emerging from one of the RV’s windows. Moments later, gunfire was reported, and at least one NMSP officer discharged their duty weapon in response.
After shots were fired, Gallegos exited the RV. Gallegos was taken into custody with the assistance of a SFPD K-9 unit. Medical aid was rendered on scene before Gallegos was transported to an area hospital to be treated for his injuries.
Through interviews, investigators learned Gallegos and his girlfriend had been arguing earlier that day. Gallegos admitted that the dispute became physical. He also admitted to firing the gun inside the RV.
No officers were injured during this incident.
Gallegos is charged with the following:
• Aggravated Assault upon a peace officer (X2)
• Battery against a household member
• Possession of a firearm or destructive device by a felon
The identity of the NMSP officer will not be released until interviews are completed. The officer has been placed on standard administrative leave. New Mexico State Police act solely as factfinders in their investigation and conduct an unbiased and impartial investigation. In officer involved shootings, NMSP thoroughly documents the scene, collects evidence, and interviews officers, subjects, and witnesses.
In turn, NMSP compiles facts as detailed as possible and forwards all reports to the appropriate district attorney for their review. The New Mexico State Police does not determine whether an officer’s actions were justified, this determination rests solely with the district attorney’s office.
Patchy rain nearby, with a high of 69 and low of 53 degrees. Clear for the morning, patchy rain nearby for the afternoon, overcast during the evening, patchy rain nearby overnight.
definitely time for a change - i've already cast my vote...have you?
I was at Zorro and can tell you all of the tarts vacationing there were ladies of the night, some Ukranians, French, Swedes. No one from the U.S was there and they certainly didn't look like they were being abused. They all wore expensive Victoria Secret lingerie, ate caviar and drank A LOT.
So many questions…
please share with us, your definition of REAL survivors.
¡Jesucristo! ¿Es que esta tipa de mierda no deja nunca de decir gilipolleces?
Que no?
gracias por escuchar o leer y por subir el rating. Nadie te obliga a escuchar, tu ignorancia es real.
LEDA LOGRT creates the capacity for the county to develop a plan and then to execute on it. How the funding may be used is already in statute, and the awarding of any public support must be done by ordinance by the county commission in a public process.
Wow! Sounds like that was some meeting! Everything short of a fistfight in the parking lot.
and the band played on...
Interesting article when read in conjunction with the opinion piece by Rene. However the qualifications he listed did not include the personal relationship with the editor who I understand is involved in the campaign of the candidate. By no means do I support the mud slinging by the blockeads.
I'm one who supports a salary, but I definitely agree this is such a poorly written bill that I will certainly vote NO.
And thank you, Chris, for such a well researched and documented argument here. I would like to share this.
as always - the devil is in the details - one item i did not see addressed; usually reimbursements (such as per diem) are not subject to federal income tax, is this the case here?
Thank you and please share