Image
New Mexico State University Title IX coordinator Laura Castille was awarded a one-time payment of $60,000 in a new 2024 settlement with the university system as the outcome after filing a lawsuit claiming she was retaliated against in the workplace.
Castille filed a complaint on February 7, 2023, and will be awarded $54,000 from the New Mexico Risk Management Division with the remaining $6,000 from New Mexico State University according to the seven-page document released on New Mexico’s government transparency and accountability portal which contains multiple items as a resource.
Laura Castille was an alumnus and was hired at the university in 2018 to serve as the executive director and coordinator of the Title IX office.
The complaint filed by Ms. Castille alleged that many of NMSU’s top leadership at the time of her employment of gross mismanagement, abuse of authority and violation of university policy. She also alleged her civil rights under the Whistleblower Protection Act had been violated.
According to reporting provided by the Las Cruces Sun to the Alamogordo News, out of all the officials named in that suit, Castille mostly recalled her interactions with former Vice Chancellor and Chief Operating Officer Ruth Johnston. She alleged Johnston had changed, a job posting for the chief auditor position to fit the qualifications of a preferred candidate. Castille, responsible for ensuring postings complied with state law, noticed the change and reported it to colleagues resulting in her being put on leave and later resigning, according to the complaint.
In the settlement that Castille signed on Jan. 24, 2024, the university did not admit to any of her claims or agree to any liability moving forward but did agree to remove a July 28, 2022, written reprimand from her personnel file.
A pre-trial conference and docket call were scheduled for May 2024 but dismissed by Judge Manuel Arrieta, who presided over the case, because Castille agreed to the settlement.
about as useful outcome as could be hoped for...but i still wonder about the commission meeting on the 22nd - trust but verify.
S'cuse me, but ain't there already another empty observatory outside Downtown Cloudcroft? *** is the pearl-clutching about? No frickin' tourists are going to tour an old hunk of junk. A ****** bar's what we need.
A what? Whats a **** bar?
Sunny, with a high of 99 and low of 68 degrees. Sunny for the morning, clear for the afternoon and evening,
any city/town/village not looking after their water supplies, treatment facilities and delivery systems is being administered by idiots, i.e. timberon. and another opportunity to repeat that no data centers should be considered viable in the southwest unless they give prior commitments to supply <
First of all this “environmental activism” is mostly a group of failed bureaucrats doing interpretive dance in the town square, hoping someone will clap, because Bonito never drew crowds so much as it collected stray shopping carts and the occasional confused goose—so pouring money into keeping it open for a few tho
More comments from people afraid to use their real names. Makes their comments worth zero. Sorry, bumble bee tuna. Show yourself out.
and their comments need to be preserved to illuminate the fact that many people are simply fools. years ago, i read that the Mescalero Apache's were the highest per capita income native-american nation in our country. they had the good fortune to be banished to a place that had no oil/gold/diamonds/copper/or any o
When they say avoid spreading unconfirmed info they mean only spread the police's confirmed biased version of events! One example is there has been no transparency, has to how a man with his arms raised up above his head justifies means for deadly force.
Would you be so kind as to publish with a real name? It is an interesting talk to text comment, unfortunately I place very little value in a statement made by someone who is not brave enough to stand by their own words.
this is why body-cams and dash-cams are best practice public policy.
this will be a highly significant vote by the commissioners - it will be the first test of the new four vote majority that rehired the old/new city manager - and i'd make a sporting wager that they stick together.