Image

Legislation that would require greater transparency from lobbyists in the Roundhouse has passed the Senate and awaits a concurrence vote in the House before it can head to the governor.
On a vote of 22-15, the Senate approved House Bill 143 late Monday. In its original form local Otero County Representative John Block opposed more transparency in funding to New Mexico legislators, to be expected based on his known donors.
The legislation, which is sponsored by Rep. Sarah Silva, D-Las Cruces, would require lobbyists to disclose what legislation they are working to influence and identify the clients paying them to do that work.
That information would be shared in a report that would be available on the Legislature’s website alongside the relevant bill, just like fiscal impact reports and other documents that are currently posted there for the public.
This basic transparency is not currently required in New Mexico, and was opposed by John Block which, according to OpenSecrets.org, trails most other states in lobbyist disclosure
HB143 would require a paid lobbyist to file a lobbyist activity report within 48 hours of trying to influence an issue or help writing a bill, or changing their position on a bill.
Disappointing many local constituents both Senators Townsend and Paul also opposed the measure for increased transparency in lobby money reaching state legislators.
“This wasn’t an easy bill to take on as a freshman, but I knew it was necessary because of my experience as an organizer and advocate living four hours from the Roundhouse,” Silva said. “I know how hard it is for New Mexicans to get a real and true account of what happens during their legislative sessions. This is one step in helping them do that.”
Silva thanked her co-sponsor, Sen. Jeff Steinborn, D-Las Cruces, who has been working to increase lobbyist transparency for years.
“Sen. Steinborn has been a tenacious advocate for transparency, and I’m honored to be working alongside him,” she said.
The Senate Rules Committee made a small change to the legislation, stripping an amendment that was added to the bill during the floor debate in the House. That’s why the House has to take one more vote to agree to the Senate version of the legislation.
The final House vote is expected imminently.
You can find House Bill 143 here: https://www.nmlegis.gov/Legislation/Legislation?chamber=H&legType=B&legNo=143&year=25
Patchy rain nearby, with a high of 86 and low of 65 degrees. Don't forget your umbrella! Sunny in the morning, cloudy in the afternoon, partly cloudy in the evening,
What, no outrage for this poor victim of federal law enforcement who only acted in self defense?
i would make a polite suggestion; please describe the guys working on the store fronts as facade crews.
the term facade squad makes me think of another group of masked federal agents dispatched to do the trump regimes' dirty work.
If I don't feel like sitting at a table, will the Oppenheimer have a Geiger counter?
Torrez engaged in another frivolous lawsuit.
As I've stated previously, the grants in question were a demonstration program. Of course Dems like Torrez only know one meaning of the word demonstration, but this grant was not intended to provide funding for protests, it was a trial program.
I'm calling on the Secretary of Agriculture to change the official designation of the Lincoln from National Forest, to National Ashtray.
It's designation should be more in line with it's actual use.
does this mean that you don't have a personal relationship with brooke rollins? saying that, has pam bondi ever gotten back in touch with you regarding the source of funding for all those nasty protests against dear leader's royal inclinations? couple weeks back, you told us that news was going to break immedia
After looking at New Mexico election law, a person may run as a candidate for office in the primary of the party they are registered with, without first seeking that party's approval.
this is just another echo of the fight to recognize the health risks of exposure to agent orange in the decades after the vietnam war.
Laymans translation, Mr. Sharp is having some problems proving his clients contracted cancer from PFAS.
Notice he's not crying about coverage for known cancer causing agents, but PRESUMED cancer causing agents. That's because to date, there is no known PROOF of any adverse health effects from PFAS.
there's neighbor john, right on schedule. he has already declared his willingness for other folks to be exposed to well established risks in environmental situations - just as long as he can't see them from where he lives.
So, Miyagishima is going after Republican and Independent voters instead of the Democrat base in a blue state who's election laws are heavily biased towards Democrats. Tells you something about the state of the Democrat Party.