Image

USA Facts presents some interesting facts on changing households and why Americans are uneasy with change. The proportion of single American households with no children has more than doubled since 1960, per USAFacts.org.
In 2022, more than half of American households were childless: 29% were married households without children, and 28.9% were single households without kids. More than a quarter of households included parents — 17.8% were married households, while 8.1% were single-parent households.
In 1960, households with married parents represented over 44% of all American households, while slightly over 13% were single with no children. Today, that’s inverted — in 2022, single people living alone and married couples without children outnumbered married-parent households.
Other household types have also become more common. Single-person households increased more than fivefold, from 6.9 million in 1960 to 37.9 million in 2022. In 2020, the Census Bureau also estimated that approximately 9 million US households are maintained by a cohabitating, unmarried couple, two-thirds of which are childless.
The proportion of American households that are married without children has remained relatively consistent since 1960, but the number of married households has increased with the country’s population. There were 38.1 million married, childless households in 2022, a 140% increase over 1960 — the country’s population grew by 84.5% during that same period.
For the latest data on households and marriage, read the America in Facts 2023 report.
Patchy rain nearby, with a high of 86 and low of 65 degrees. Don't forget your umbrella! Sunny in the morning, cloudy in the afternoon, partly cloudy in the evening,
What, no outrage for this poor victim of federal law enforcement who only acted in self defense?
i would make a polite suggestion; please describe the guys working on the store fronts as facade crews.
the term facade squad makes me think of another group of masked federal agents dispatched to do the trump regimes' dirty work.
If I don't feel like sitting at a table, will the Oppenheimer have a Geiger counter?
Torrez engaged in another frivolous lawsuit.
As I've stated previously, the grants in question were a demonstration program. Of course Dems like Torrez only know one meaning of the word demonstration, but this grant was not intended to provide funding for protests, it was a trial program.
I'm calling on the Secretary of Agriculture to change the official designation of the Lincoln from National Forest, to National Ashtray.
It's designation should be more in line with it's actual use.
does this mean that you don't have a personal relationship with brooke rollins? saying that, has pam bondi ever gotten back in touch with you regarding the source of funding for all those nasty protests against dear leader's royal inclinations? couple weeks back, you told us that news was going to break immedia
After looking at New Mexico election law, a person may run as a candidate for office in the primary of the party they are registered with, without first seeking that party's approval.
this is just another echo of the fight to recognize the health risks of exposure to agent orange in the decades after the vietnam war.
Laymans translation, Mr. Sharp is having some problems proving his clients contracted cancer from PFAS.
Notice he's not crying about coverage for known cancer causing agents, but PRESUMED cancer causing agents. That's because to date, there is no known PROOF of any adverse health effects from PFAS.
there's neighbor john, right on schedule. he has already declared his willingness for other folks to be exposed to well established risks in environmental situations - just as long as he can't see them from where he lives.
So, Miyagishima is going after Republican and Independent voters instead of the Democrat base in a blue state who's election laws are heavily biased towards Democrats. Tells you something about the state of the Democrat Party.