Image
The National Gallery in London houses a portrait by Dutch painter Ferdinand Bol of an eight-year-old kid holding a cup.
The 400 year old painting has raised some questions and eyebrows of recent and the internet is running amuck with conspiracy theories. Some have suggested the boy in the painting was a time traveler and, oops forgot to change his shoes prior to posing for the painting. Another theory is there is a glitch in the matrix, a rift in the continuum? Another theory is the artist was much like Nostradamus, and the painting depicted a brand that would have a huge impact on the world.
The baffling discovery was made while the painting was on loan to London's National Gallery, and it's causing some to wonder and has become fodder for the internet conspiracy world. He's elegantly dressed in the fashions of his day, with a grey suit and matching cloak, but the shoes look like Nike!
One benefit of having one of the most widely known logos of modern times is people see it everywhere. Even in 17th-century paintings. A large portion of the internet is currently convinced that the young gentleman in this painting by the Dutch master Ferdinand Bol is wearing a pair of Nike shoes.
Bol is considered one of Rembrandt’s most talented apprentices. This painting, which is in a private collection, was initially thought to depict his own son but is now believed to show Frederick Sluysken, the son of a wealthy Dutch wine merchant. Look closely at his feet, and there does seem to be something of a likeness to the Nike tick on the black shoes.

The 400 year old painting is trending worldwide with a newfound interest in the painting, and now the artist. Apparently, it was a mother and daughter who noticed the detail when the painting was on loan to London's National Gallery. The gallery took up their comment and asked people on Twitter if they could spot the "modern detail?”
What are some glitches or anomalies in space-time or reality that make you question everything? Share your thoughts in the comments of this article. We’d love to hear your opinions!
Moderate rain, with a high of 69 and low of 41 degrees. Sunny in the morning, patchy rain nearby in the afternoon and evening, clear overnight.
a clearly written and balanced overview of the technical aspects of this trial.
Well written. What are your qualifications as to your views again?
Doctor of what?
Dr Rameriz is a retired trial attorney and retired university professor with adoctorate of criminal justice
In this case, he recorded his own crime. No excuses.
there can be no question that the legal requirements for bodycams as well as dashcams have altered the balance of legal standards. eye-witnesses now have limited abilities to sway the facts - in either direction - and both LEO's and the public are better served as the result.
one very useful distinction between noriega and maduro: noriega was for many years an associate of the CIA, receiving money, weapons and "other considerations" funneled off the books to act as their surrogate in panama and other locales.
kinda like Castro, Marcos, Hussein both Saddam and barack.
Sounds like a typical corporate democrat following wherever his donors want him to go. We need progressive leftists, not center-right lackeys.
He has more in common with what we used to call country club Republicans than he does with the left.
First, Maduro is a terrible human being, and no one should be sad to see him go.
But, that does not mean it was a good move for the US to play world police. And the Venezuelans should take caution, we never do anything unless it suits our interests.
Ahahahahaha. Good ol Demp-Cs!
to add a few facts to Infidel 64's, please consider: