Image

A bill, HB 5 that would provide new oversight of the heavily criticized Children Youth and Families Department went to the Governor for signature after passage by the legislature. Governor Lujane-Grisham was criticized by the New Mexico Attorney General as the legislation is signed into law.
New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez celebrates the signing of House Bill 5 (HB5) as a crucial step forward in safeguarding our children and ensuring accountability within the system meant to protect them. This legislation marks a victory for the most vulnerable among us — New Mexico’s children — and reflects a tireless effort to put their welfare first.
“While we are encouraged by HB5 becoming law, we are deeply disappointed that the Governor chose to center the discussion around herself and her inner circle,” said Chief of Staff, Lauren Rodriguez. “The focus of this bill should have remained squarely on the children who suffer from neglect, abuse, and systemic failures. Nowhere in the Governor’s statement is there acknowledgment of their struggles or the urgent need for reform. I believe leadership means prioritizing the people we serve, not engaging in personal grievances.”
HB5 stands for meaningful change — creating an independent Office of the Child Advocate to ensure transparency and accountability and fighting for those who can’t fight for themselves. The New Mexico Department of Justice remains committed to working alongside lawmakers, advocates, and communities to improve the lives of New Mexico’s children. This legislation is about creating a safer, stronger future for all families in our state.
According to an analysis from the Administrative Office of the Courts, the director of the new office would carry the title of State Child Advocate, and would be selected by a committee of nine whose members are selected by the governor, legislature, attorney general, and supreme court.
The Office of Child Advocate’s long list of oversight duties would include reviewing all CYFD services, policies, and procedures; investigate complaints about CYFD; adopt rules, and compile an annual report.
a perfect example of the incompetence of the trump regime - bathwater out - baby out...details - we don't need no stinkin details. the only paint brush they possess must be half a mile wide...government by fools and charlatans.
This was not a notice of action, but a request for compliance.
Sunny, with a high of 95 and low of 65 degrees. Sunny for the morning, clear overnight.
Teaching in a low-performing school serving economically disadvantaged populations.
That pretty much covers every teacher in the state.
This executive order does nothing that the governor couldn't have done on her own without an EO.
While the Office of the Governor's website calls this a drought emergency, no where in the actual EO is it called an emergency, nor or emergency powers invoked.
Dolly has started a great program and I commend her efforts.
I know it's been a while since I've bought a children's book, but I don't think $33 per book would be considered a bargain even at today's prices.
I neglected to account for the fact that the program gives up to 12 books a year to children, bringing the cost per book to under $3, a very reasonable price indeed.
My apologies for the omission.
The proposed rules would likely force all outdoor construction to happen only between the hours of dusk - dawn from April - October.
I wonder how many of the idiots proposing and supporting this rule need a new roof on their house, or on their neighbors house.
it's interesting to read that the proposed "wording is dangerous to small business owners"....please consider the potential for danger to the folks who are working in the heat. one danger is an inconvenience/expense - the other is potential death.
I would take it that you have not read the actual proposed rule. The link is in the article.
I believe that even as a former construction worker who would seem to want better rules in place, you'll end up agreeing that the proposed rules go to far.
So after months of investigation, only 3 items were substantiated.
First, a failure to use the increased funding on capital improvements (fixing the ac). This is a matter that should receive priority, as physical activity should play a major role in any youth center.