Image
Vote NO on Constitutional Amendment 4. It sets a salary for New Mexico's 112 legislators but never defines the job that salary pays for.
Amendment 4 would pay each legislator the state's median household income — about $67,800 today — starting with members seated in January 2029. The figure adjusts every year after that. Legislators would keep their $247-a-day per diem, their mileage and their pension.
We understand the appeal. New Mexico is the only state that pays its lawmakers no salary, and serving in Santa Fe costs real money. But voters are being asked to approve the paycheck first and settle the work later. That is backwards.
The Legislature meets 60 days in odd-numbered years and 30 days in even-numbered years. Outside those sessions, nothing in Amendment 4 requires a minimum number of hours, a district office, town halls, constituent-service standards or attendance at interim committees.
The Legislative Council Service's own nonpartisan analysis notes the amendment leaves open what counts as legislative service, how the income figure is set, and how benefits, pensions and per diem are treated. It places no limit on outside income. No legislator would have to leave another job. A member could draw the full salary and keep a full-time career.
How much do legislators work now? Supporters cite a 2023 survey in which legislators reported averaging about 20 hours a week on legislative work year-round. Take that at face value: 20 hours times 52 weeks is about 1,040 hours — half a full-time schedule.
At $67,800, that is roughly $65 an hour, the equivalent of about $135,600 for a full-time worker. And that figure is self-reported, not drawn from time records. The Legislature's own 2022 study by UNM's Bureau of Business and Economic Research drew survey answers from 43 of the 112 members.
In a 60-day session year, salary plus session per diem alone comes to $82,620 — before interim committee days, mileage or pension credit. Add 20 interim committee days and it passes $87,500.
|
Piece |
Amount |
Notes |
|---|---|---|
|
Salary |
about $67,800 a year |
Tied to state median household income; starts 2029 |
|
Session per diem |
$14,820 (60-day) / $7,410 (30-day) |
$247 a day, kept on top of salary |
|
Interim per diem |
$247 a day |
Committee meetings between sessions |
|
Mileage |
Reimbursed |
Kept on top of salary |
|
Pension |
about $3,112 a year of pension per year served |
PERA formula: 14% × per diem × 90 × years; $1,000-a-year member contribution |
|
Other benefits |
Door opened |
Amendment strikes the ban on other "perquisites or allowances" |
The pension is already generous. At today's per diem, 10 years of service earns about $31,100 a year for life; 20 years earns about $62,200. Lawmakers raised that formula by 50% in 2024.
On health care, current law lets legislators join the state plan only if they pay the full premium. But by deleting the constitutional ban on other allowances, Amendment 4 lets a future Legislature add benefits for itself.
The cost of salaries alone is about $7.6 million a year. The proposed pay would also exceed the 2025 national average legislative salary of $44,320, and top what lawmakers earn in Texas, Colorado and Arizona.
The people responsible for our patients, students and children work full time and earn less — or about the same — for twice the hours.
|
Job (New Mexico) |
Pay |
Schedule |
|---|---|---|
|
Proposed legislator salary |
about $67,800 + per diem, retirement topping (87,000 annually) |
30/60-day session; ~20 hrs/week self-reported |
|
CYFD protective-services worker |
most paid $55,273–$82,747 (top senior supervisor) |
Full time; caseloads have run double the national average |
|
Roswell police officer, starting |
$58,553 |
Full time, 12-hour patrol shifts |
|
Average teacher starting salary |
$50,628 |
Full school year plus prep and grading |
|
Certified nursing assistant, median |
$39,390 |
Full time, nights and weekends common |
A nursing assistant working full time earns about $19 an hour. By supporters' own hours estimate, a legislator would earn about $65 an hour in salary alone.
These workers can be fired for not showing up. Amendment 4 sets no such standard for the people who would set their budgets.
Even some who favor pay have doubts about this version. The Rio Grande Foundation's Paul Gessing says he is not against salaries in principle, only this amount. An Albuquerque Journal opinion columnist who backs legislative pay plans to vote no because it arrives without transparency reforms.
A proposal worth supporting would:
Vote NO on Amendment 4, and ask every legislative candidate on your ballot to bring back a plan that defines the work before it sets the pay.
Voters should weigh the other side. Supporters — including Common Cause New Mexico, NM CAFé and the Vote For Change coalition — argue that an unpaid Legislature limits service to retirees, the wealthy and the self-employed.
Tying pay to median income keeps lawmakers' pay connected to ordinary families, and it falls if that income falls.
Per diem doesn't cover costs: most legislators surveyed said per diem and mileage fall short, and nine in ten said they work 30 or more days a year without claiming it.
A stronger Legislature: a UNM study ranked New Mexico near the bottom in legislative professionalism and recommended salaries, staff and longer sessions.
Voters are split: an August Journal Poll found 39% for the amendment, 21% against and 40% undecided or wanting details.
Our editorial board suggests a no vote on this amendment and a new amendment be introduced next legislative session better defining the terms and conditions with an independent citizens commission.